Language selection

Search


Top of page

Increasing equity, diversity and inclusion in the Canadian space sector

On this page

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. AO OBJECTIVES
  3. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
  4. SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION
  5. EVALUATION
  6. FUNDING
  7. FUNDING AGREEMENTS
  8. PRIVACY NOTICE STATEMENT
  9. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
  10. Appendix A - Detailed Scoring

Announcement of Opportunity (AO)

Class Grant and Contribution Program to Support Research, Awareness and Learning in Space Science and Technology

Space Learning Component of the Canadian Space Agency's Class Grant and Contributions Program

KEY INFORMATION

  • Eligible recipients:
    • Canadian post-secondary educational institutions, such as a college, technical institute, or university
    • Not-for-profit organizations
  • Type of transfer payments: Grants
  • Maximum amount per project (2 funding categories):
    • Category A: $20,000
    • Category B: $50,000
  • Maximum project duration: up to 2 years

IMPORTANT DATES

  • 2024
    • Cycle 1 :
      • Publication date:
      • Application deadline:
    • Cycle 2 :
      • Application deadline:
  • 2025
    • Cycle 3 :
      • Application deadline:
    • Cycle 4 :
      • Application deadline:
  • 2026
    • Cycle 5 :
      • Application deadline:

1 INTRODUCTION

Canada's space sector plays an essential role in our society, impacting our daily lives and contributing to innovation, scientific research and economic growth. Experiments performed in space help us understand health problems on Earth. Satellites provide data on climate change, measure pollution, and help protect our planet. Space technologies improve products we use every day, weather forecasts, and communications worldwide.

The ingenuity required for space exploration also helps build the workforce of tomorrow. Canada's space workforce creates approximately 12,000 careers for highly skilled people in our national economy, and supports an additional 12,000 jobs indirectly. With projections of significant growth for both the domestic and global space sector, Canada needs to prepare for the future by attracting talented, highly qualified individuals to pursue careers in space.

Canada's Space Strategy, Exploration, Imagination, Innovation: A New Space Strategy for Canada, the Government of Canada set a clear objective that Canadians of diverse origins benefit equitably from jobs, skills and economic growth in the space sector. Many studies have show that certain populations are under-represented in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) related fields in Canada, particularly women, Indigenous Peoples, visible minorities (especially the Black community) and handicapped people. For instance, only 29% of employees in Canada's space sector identify as female.

Canada can do more to recognize and remedy these gaps so that our national space workforce reflects the wealth of Canada's cultural diversity. With this Announcement of Opportunity (AO), Increasing equity, diversity and inclusion in the Canadian space sector, the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) seeks to promote equity and diversity in the next generation of space professionals in Canada and make the Canadian space workforce more inclusive by providing space-related training opportunities for underrepresented populations.

This AO is consistent with the terms and conditions of the Class Grant and Contribution Program that supports Research, Awareness and Learning in Space Science and Technology at the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) – Learning component.

Applicants are asked to read the following AO thoroughly before submitting their applications. This AO was prepared to help applicants complete the application process, and outlines key elements, including mandatory criteria for eligibility, details on eligible projects and the selection process. In the event of any discrepancies between this AO and the individual funding agreements governing a project, the latter document(s) will take precedence.

2 AO OBJECTIVES

This AO aims to offer under-represented groups an opportunity to increase their level of applied knowledge in space science and technology and promote their professional development in order to increase equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in Canada's space workforce.

3 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

In this section 3

3.1 Eligible Recipients

Eligible recipients are:

  • Canadian universities and post-secondary educational institutions, such as a college or a technical institute;
  • Not-for-profit organizations established and active in Canada.

The CSA recognizes that representation is both important and valuable. Priority may be given to organizations that reflect the demographic(s) they seek to represent (for example, at the time of selection, priority may be given to a proposal from an Indigenous not-for-profit organization for an activity specifically for Indigenous students, providing it is eligible and meets the objective of the AO).

3.2 Eligible Projects

To be eligible, proposed projects must enable post-secondary students targeted by this AO to advance their knowledge of space:

  • Women;
  • Indigenous Peoples;
  • Persons with disabilities; and
  • Visible minorities, particularly those from Black community

Proposed projects must fall under one of these categories:

  • Category A: Learning, training, networking activities and developmental projects for post-secondary students targeted by this AO:
    • Up to a maximum of $20,000 for a project with a maximum duration of two years, with the exception of projects submitted in cycle 5, which will fund one-year projects only. Projects can include, but are not limited to:
      • Organizing hands-on learning activities allowing target clientele(s) to develop their knowledge of space (e.g., workshops on art, health or nutrition in space, designing small payloads, etc.);
      • Creating internship opportunities, or offering support to the target clientele(s) of this AO in seeking and obtaining space-related internships;
      • Offering mentoring activities for the target clientele(s) of this AO in order to build awareness of careers and employment opportunities in the space sector and, through mentoring, acquire hands-on knowledge and experience related to these jobs;
      • Establishing networks among students or student groups from one or more target clienteles of this AO to facilitate the hiring and retention of individuals from under-represented groups in the space sector.
  • Category B: Support for major space-related activities, events and initiatives for post-secondary students targeted by this AO:
    • Up to a maximum of $50,000 for a project with a maximum duration of two years, with the exception of projects submitted in cycle 5, which will fund one-year projects only. Projects can include, but are not limited to:
      • competitions, or student participation in such competitions, to provide one or more of the target clienteles of this AO with the opportunity to increase their practical and applied knowledge of space science and technology;
      • National events or initiatives for one or more target clienteles of this AO, such as national or international conferences, or training in space-related topics that would complement the offerings of educational institutions;
      • Space-related challenges, hackathons or other similar brainstorming activities designed for one or more target clienteles of this AO;
      • hands-on activities for one or more target clienteles of this AO on the topics of Earth Observation or lunar exploration (Artemis II mission, Lunar Gateway

Please note that the activities mentioned above are examples only, and that a learning project identified under category A could also be eligible under category B if it is a major project.

All development phases necessary for a project are eligible. Any logical breakdown or combination of these phases can constitute a funded project under this AO. However, breaking down a project into numerous phases submitted as distinct proposals to obtain more than the maximum grant or contribution under this AO is not allowed. Furthermore, the completion of a funded phase does not automatically guarantee future funding of the remaining phases.

3.3 Links to CSA Priorities

To be eligible, projects supported under this AO must create opportunities learning experiences for the target clientele of this AO so that they benefit equitably from the jobs, skills development and economic growth of Canada's space sector.

3.4 Links to Class G&C Program Objectives

To be eligible, projects supported under this AO must contribute to achieving at least one of the following objectives:

  • Foster the continuing development of a critical mass of researchers and highly qualified people in Canada in areas relevant to the priorities of the Canadian Space Agency;
  • Provide learning opportunities to post-secondary Canadian students in various space-related activities and disciplines;

4 SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION

In this section 4

Applicants must read the following section carefully and follow all the steps indicated below to ensure that their application is complete.

It is important to note that neither hand-delivered nor emailed applications will be accepted. Applicants are also asked to not send their application both electronically and by mail or courier service. If an applicant fails to comply with this requirement, only the latest valid version received will be considered for evaluation.

The onus is on the applicant to ensure that their application is complete and that all documents are uploaded or received by the CSA by the prescribed deadline. After the deadline, the CSA has no obligation to proceed with the evaluation and funding process. Incomplete or late applications will be rejected.

4.1 Required Documentation

To be complete, the application must contain the following:

  • A completed application form (see details in Section 4.2) signed by the authorized representative. Electronic or scanned signatures will be accepted, but applicants must keep a hard copy of the original signed application form as the CSA may require documents with the original signature at a later date.

The following documents may be required upon request:

  • Proof of incorporation or registration and a copy of any document confirming the applicant's legal name;
  • Any other document judged necessary for approval of the application.

4.2 Submitting an Application Electronically

Follow these steps to submit your application electronically:

  1. Submit an account creation request using the Electronic Proposal Portal, at least three weeks before the application deadline as indicated in the IMPORTANT DATES section. Note that the supported browsers are Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge. Then follow these steps to create your account:
    1. In the "Proposal Title" field of the Electronic Proposal Portal, please use the following formatting standard: or or _Cycle #_Funding Category (A or B) _Name of applicant (organization)_Project Title.
    2. Allow up to 48 hours for the CSA to send you an email confirming your account creation along with instructions (user guide) and appropriate links, including the link to the online application form.
  2. Using the password assigned to you by the CSA, access and complete the online application form. Note that you can save the information you entered and return to the form later, if necessary, but your application must be submitted by the application deadline date.
  3. After completing the application form, print it as a PDF document before you click "submit."
  4. Sign the copy of your application form (electronic signature accepted) and attach it as a PDF format (searchable PDF, preferably in PDF/A-1a or PDF/A-2a formats, with all security features disabled).
  5. Submit your complete application electronically by connecting to the secure portal to upload protected documents, using the password assigned to you by the CSA. Refer to the user guide to learn how to securely upload your documents.

IMPORTANT NOTES

Applicants are encouraged to create their account as soon as possible, since technical issues could arise. If these technical issues cannot be resolved, applicants can mail their application (see Section 4.3 to learn more). Applicants are strongly encouraged to upload their complete file well before the application deadline (deadlines for each cycle are indicated in the IMPORTANT DATES section). Please also review the general instructions on the application process in Section 4.

4.3 Submitting an Application by Mail or Recognized Courier Service

Applicants are encouraged to submit their application electronically following instructions provided in Section 4.2 of the AO. However, if an applicant is unable to submit their application electronically, they should contact stedia-dstemu@asc-csa.gc.ca no later than 30 days before the cycle closing date in order to obtain instructions on how to submit an application by mail or a recognized courier service.
The onus is on the applicant to ensure that their application is complete and that all documents are received at the CSA before the prescribed deadline. The CSA is not responsible for delivery delays and will refuse applications received after the stipulated deadline.

4.4 Service Standards

Applicants will be notified in writing of decisions regarding their application. Selected applications will be announced on the CSA website. The CSA has set the following service standards for processing times, acknowledgement of receipt, funding decisions and payment procedures.

Acknowledgement of receipt: The CSA's goal is to acknowledge receipt within two (2) weeks of receiving the complete application.

Decision: The CSA's goal is to inform applicants of the results of the assessment within fifteen (15) weeks after the cycle closing date and to send a grant agreement for signature within four (4) weeks after formal approval of the proposal.

Payments: The CSA's goal is to issue payment within two (2) weeks of the successful fulfillment of the requirements outlined in the grant agreement.

Compliance with these service standards is a shared responsibility. Applicants must submit all required documentation in a timely fashion. Service standards may vary by Announcement of Opportunity.

5 EVALUATION

In this section 5

5.1 Eligibility Criteria

The CSA will first assess the eligibility of applications by verifying that they meet the eligibility criteria of the AO. Only applications deemed eligible will be considered.

5.2 Evaluation Criteria

Applications will be evaluated based on the following criteria:

  • Benefits to Canada;
  • Project Feasibility;
  • Resources; and
  • Results.

Table 1 below shows the criteria, sub-criteria, and associated thresholds, while Table 2 gives a brief description of the evaluated criteria. A detailed breakdown of all evaluation criteria is given in Appendix A. To be eligible for funding, a project must obtain a total score of 70/100 or more for these evaluated criteria.

Table 1: Summary of evaluation criteria
Criteria Maximum points for evaluation Minimum points to pass Poor Average Good Excellent
1. Benefits to Canada: having greater equity, diversity and inclusion in the space sector 35 25
1.1 Merit of project 25 - 0 8 18 25
1.2 Alignment with the CSA priorities and the Class G&C Program Objectives 10 0 3 7 10
2. Project feasibility 30 17
2.1 Plan feasibility 20 - 0 10 15 20
2.2 Project related risks and mitigation strategies 10 - 0 3 7 10
3. Resources 25 17
3.1 Budget 10 - 0 3 7 10
3.2 Expertise and representation with target clientele 15 - 0 5 10 15
4. Results 10 7
4.1 Scope and sustainability 10 - 0 5 7 10
Table 2: Definition and breakdown of evaluation criteria
Criteria Maximum and minimum points for evaluation
1. Benefits to Canada: having greater equity, diversity and inclusion in the space field Maximum score: 35
Minimum score: 25
1.1 Merit of project The aim of this criterion is to assess if the proposal demonstrates that the proposed approach meets the needs of the space sector, is innovative, and has a high potential to reach the clientele targeted by the AO.
1.2 Alignment with the CSA priorities and the Class G&C Program Objectives The aim of this criterion is to assess how the project will contribute to the CSA priorities set out in Section 3.3 and the Class G&C Program Objectives set out in Section 3.4 of this AO.
2. Project Feasibility Maximum score: 30
Minimum score : 17
2.1 Plan feasibility The aim of this criterion is to assess the degree to which the proposal demonstrates that the proposed work will be completed during the grant period. The schedule must summarize the milestones and deadlines.
2.2 Project related risks and mitigation strategies The aim of this criterion is to assess the extent to which the proposal identifies the risks associated with the scope of the proposed activities, an assessment of the potential probability of the risks occurring, their level of impact on the activities, and mitigation strategies for each risk identified.
3. Resources Maximum score: 25
Minimum score : 17
3.1 Budget The aim of this criterion is to assess whether the expenses associated with the project activities submitted are eligible and reasonable for the successful completion of the project. This criterion will also consider prior experience of the organization and team members in managing budgets for projects of similar scope to the one proposed.
3.2 Expertise and representation with target clientele The aim of this criterion is to assess the experience and representation of the organization and the team that will work with the target clientele. The proposal must include a description of prior experience with the target clientele and the role and responsibilities of team members who will be involved in the project, and whether team members identify as belonging to the designated target groups of this AO.
4. Results Maximum score: 10
Minimum score: 7
4.1 Scope and sustainability The aim of this criterion is to assess the immediate and medium-term impact and the sustainability of proposed project activities and how it contributes to the knowledge, integration and recognition of the clientele targeted by this AO in the space sector.

5.3 Evaluation Process

Only applications that have passed the eligibility assessment listed in Section 5.1 be given further consideration.

Once the eligibility criteria are confirmed, evaluators will assess the screened applications according to the criteria listed in Section 5.2. Evaluators shall be experts in the fields relevant to the applications and may include representatives of Canada and other countries, and representatives of other government and non-government agencies and organizations. If applicable, a multidisciplinary evaluation committee will be formed when applications from several different disciplines are competing in order to provide a uniform final score and ranking of proposals.

Before a final decision is made, the CSA's Program Manager responsible for this AO may seek input and advice from other organizations, including (but not limited to) federal, provincial, territorial and municipal government agencies and organizations.

The results obtained in this AO could take into account certain factors in the final decision to grant funding, such as, but not limited to, the representativeness of the four designated groups (woman, Indigenous Peoples, disabled persons or members of a visible minority and, in particular, the Black community), regional distribution, as well as distribution between universities and post-secondary educational institutions and not-for-profit organizations.

6 FUNDING

In this section 6

6.1 Available Funding

Transfer payments will be made through grant agreements. The maximum funding available under this AO is currently estimated at approximately $600,000 over three fiscal years. The two possible funding categories are as follows:

  • Category A: Learning, training, networking activities and developmental projects: up to a maximum of $20,000 for a project with a maximum duration of two years except for projects submitted in cycle 5, which will fund one-year projects.
  • Category B: Support for major space-related activities, events and initiatives: up to a maximum of $50,000 for a project with a maximum duration of two years except for projects submitted in cycle 5, which will fund one-year projects.

In both categories (A and B), the applicant may submit a project with a total amount less than the maximum eligible amounts identified above. The total number of projects funded will depend on funding availability.

The CSA reserves the right to reject any proposals or to reduce the amount of the grants at its entire discretion.

Approved proposals will be eligible for total government assistance (federal, provincial, territorial and municipal) of up to 100% of total project costs.

To determine the amount of funding that to be allocated, consideration will be given to the availability of CSA funds, the total cost of the project, and other confirmed sources of funds provided by other stakeholders and the applicant.

Applicants must identify all sources of funding in their applications and confirm this information in a funding agreement if the project is selected for funding. Upon completion of a project, the recipient must also disclose all sources of funding.

6.2 Eligible Costs

Eligible costs are direct expenses that are associated with the delivery of the approved project and that are required to achieve the expected results of the project. Expenses will be covered, subject to the applicant signing a funding agreement, in the form of a grant with the CSA.

Eligible costs for a grant under this AO are the following:

  • Access fees;
  • Accommodation and meal allowances;
  • Acquisition, development and printing of materials;
  • Acquisition or rental of equipment;
  • Aircraft and watercraft charter services;
  • Consultant services;
  • Costs for carrying out environmental screening and/or impact studies;
  • Costs related to obtaining security clearance;
  • Data acquisition;
  • Data management;
  • Laboratory analysis services;
  • License and permit fees;
  • Marketing and printing services;
  • Materials and supplies;
  • Overhead (administrative) costs (not to exceed 10% of eligible costs);
  • Participation fees at conferences, committee and events;
  • PST, HST and GST net of any rebate to which the recipient is entitled, and the reimbursement of any taxes for goods and services acquired in a foreign country net of any rebate or reimbursement received in the foreign country;
  • Publication and communication services;
  • Registration fees;
  • Salaries and benefits;
  • Training;
  • Translation services; and
  • Travel expenses.

Funds may not be redistributed under this AO.

7 FUNDING AGREEMENTS

In this section 7

7.1 Payments

The CSA and each successful applicant (the recipient) will sign a funding agreement. This is a condition for any payment made by the CSA with respect to the approved project.
For grant agreements, payments will be made in a lump sum or instalments as described in the signed agreement. Grant funding agreements will include a clause stipulating the recipient's obligation to confirm once a year in the case of multi-year agreements their eligibility for the G&C Program – Learning Component and inform the CSA in writing of any changes to the conditions used in determining their eligibility for this component.

7.2 Audit

The recipient of a funding agreement shall keep proper records of all documentation related to the funded project, for the duration of the project and for six (6) years after the completion date of the project, in the event of an audit. This documentation shall be available upon request.

7.3 Conflict of Interest

In the funding agreement, the recipient will certify that any current or former public office holder or public servant it employs complies with the provisions of the relevant Conflict of Interest and Post-Employment Code for Public Office Holders and the Values and Ethics Code for the Public Sector respectively.

7.4 Intellectual Property

All intellectual property developed by the recipient in the course of the project shall vest in the recipient.

7.5 Organizations in Quebec

An organization in Quebec whose operations are partially or fully funded by the province of Quebec may be subject to the Act respecting the Ministère du Conseil exécutif, CQLR c M-30.

Under Sections 3.11 and 3.12 of this Act, certain entities/organizations, as defined in the meaning of the Act, such as municipal bodies, school bodies, or public agencies, must obtain authorization from the Secrétariat du Québec aux relations canadiennes (SQRC), as indicated by the Act, before signing any funding agreement with the Government of Canada, its departments or agencies, or a federal public agency.

Consequently, an entity that is subject to the Act is responsible for obtaining such authorization before signing any funding agreement with the Government of Canada.

Quebec applicants must complete, sign and include the M-30 Supporting Documentation form with their application.

7.6 Performance Measurement

The CSA will ask recipients to report on certain aspects of their projects such as:

  • Knowledge creation:
    • Number and type of activities;
    • Advancement of practical and applied knowledge.
  • Collaboration and networking:
    • Number of partnerships reached to mobilize the target clientele;
    • Number of links established with principal actors in the space sector;
    • Number of networking activities conducted;
    • Number of internships offered to participants;
    • Number of mentors who participated in the project.
  • Equity, diversity and inclusion:
    • Number of women, Indigenous Peoples, persons with disabilities and members of visible minorities, particularly from the Black community, reached by the project;
    • Satisfaction rate of project participants.

8 PRIVACY NOTICE STATEMENT

The CSA manages and protects the information provided by the applicant under the Privacy Actand the Access to Information Act. By submitting your personal information, you consent to its collection, use and disclosure in accordance with the following Privacy Statement, which explains how the information about the applicant will be processed.

The information is collected under the CSA Class Grant and Contribution Program in Support of Awareness, Research and Learning - Research Component (ASC PPU 045) and Awareness and Learning Component (ASC PPU 040). This information will be used for administration and application evaluation purposes. Personal information (such as name, contact information and biographical information) will be kept for 6 years and destroyed. According to the Privacy Act, any individual may, upon request, (1) have access to his or her personal data and (2) request correction of the incorrect information.

Applicants should also note that information relating to the Funding Agreement could be disclosed publicly in accordance with the laws, policies and directives of the Government of Canada.

For additional information regarding this statement, please contact:

Office of Access to Information and Privacy Canadian Space Agency
Tel: 514-378-6174
E-mail: aiprp-atip@asc-csa.gc.ca

9 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)

It is the responsibility of the applicants to obtain clarification of the requirements contained herein, if necessary, before submitting an application.

For any questions related to the AO, applicants shall use the following email address: stedia-dstemu@asc-csa.gc.ca. Questions and answers related to this AO will be posted on the CSA website in the Frequently Asked Questions section of this AO. The CSA will respond to questions received 2 weeks before the closing date of each submission cycle.

  • Question 1: Must project activities target only participants from the under-represented groups targeted by the AO?

    Answer 1: The proposal must clearly demonstrate how the project's activities target one or more of the under-represented groups targeted by this AO. The evaluation criteria have been established accordingly.

  • Question 2: Do all projects have to serve participants?

    Answer 2: No, for category A, depending on the nature of the project, they may not directly serve participants. However, you must clearly explain the reason for this so as not to be penalized during the evaluation. Projects submitted under category B must serve participants. Before submitting a project, it is highly recommended to closely review the evaluation criteria detailed in Appendix A of the AO.

  • Question 3: Under category B, what do we mean by a major project?

    Answer 3: Projects funded under category B must serve more than 20 participants in order to obtain the maximum score for the Results criterion as part of the evaluation process.

  • Question 4: If we are not sure which category our project falls under, can we apply to both categories A and B?

    Answer 4: The main difference between the two categories is the scope of the project, the funding needed to complete it and the number of students served. We recommend that you closely review the evaluation criteria detailed in Appendix A and that you choose the category according to the elements identified above as well as the evaluation criteria, rather than submitting two identical proposals under each category.

  • Question 5: Can you describe the differences between Category A and B?

    Answer 5: The main difference between the two categories is the scope of the project, the funding needed to complete it (maximum amount of $20,000 vs maximum amount of $50,000) and the number of students directly serve more than 20). Please note that only projects submitted under category A may not serve participants directly due to the very nature of the proposed activities. The reasons for this must be clearly indicated in the application form for the Results criterion.

  • Question 6: I would like to submit project X, is this eligible?

    Answer 6: At this stage of the process, the CSA cannot comment on the eligibility of a project. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the project is eligible according to the criteria set out in section 3.2.

  • Question 7: If I already have a user account to access the Electronic Proposal Portal, do I still need to create a new account?

    Answer 7: Yes, all applicants must first create an account in the Electronic Proposal Portal in order to access the online application form specific to this AO.

  • Question 8: Can the same organization submit more than one proposal?

    Answer 8: Yes, a single organization can submit more than one proposal. Please be sure to read through section 3.2 and 5.3 of the AO, which outline certain factors that may be taken into consideration when selecting projects. It's also important to note that you must submit a new account creation request for each new proposal in order to differentiate the projects submitted under the AO.

  • Question 9: Could multiple iterations of the same project (e.g., an annual conference) be eligible for different submission cycles of the funding?

    Answer 9: Yes, the same organization can submit multiple iterations of the same project in various submission cycles. Please be sure to read through section 3.2 and 5.3 of the AO, which outline certain factors that may be taken into consideration when selecting projects.

  • Question 10: If applying under Category B, can we submit several proposals under the same category?

    Answer 10: Yes, a single organization can submit several proposals under the same category.

  • Question 11: Can the same organization apply to several submission cycles?

    Answer 11: Yes, the same organization can submit a proposal in more than one submission cycle. However, you must submit a new account creation request for each new proposal in order to differentiate the projects submitted under the AO. For more information, please read section 3.2 of the AO. Please note that approval of a project submitted in a specific cycle does not guarantee that it will be automatically approved in a subsequent cycle. The evaluation process will consider all projects submitted in a given cycle and available funding, regardless of whether a project has already been approved in a previous cycle.

  • Question 12: What do I need to submit as part of a complete application?

    Answer 12: Only the completed and signed application form is required under this AO.

  • Question 13: Is an organization established by any order of government eligible to submit an application under this AO?

    Answer 13: No, for the purpose of this AO, eligible recipients are Canadian post-secondary institutions, and not-for-profit organizations established and operating in Canada, excluding any governmental entities or organizations.

  • Question 14: Please clarify "established and active" for non-profits. Would a long-term, unincorporated non-profit apply?

    Answer 14: No, for the purpose of this AO, eligible recipients are Canadian post-secondary institutions, and not-for-profit incorporated organizations established and operating in Canada.

  • Question 15: Can the project be 100% funded by the CSA?

    Answer 15: Contributions from other partners are not mandatory under this AO, however contributions from other funding sources are encouraged. Please carefully read the evaluation criteria that have been established to take this aspect into account.

  • Question 16: What kinds of contributions from other sources of funding are accepted under this AO?

    Answer 16: Under this AO, both in-kind and monetary contributions are taken into consideration.

  • Question 17: Can we redistribute funds received from the CSA to another project partner?

    Answer 17: Under this AO, redistribution of funds is not allowed. The grant recipient must use the funds only for the direct and eligible expenses listed in the section 6.2 of the AO.

  • Question 18: Our group has long-term trainees that return for summer internships over the course of several years. If we are aiming for less than 6 trainees, will we be penalized during evaluation?

    Answer 18: This AO is developed to support new projects, designed for the targeted under-represented groups. We recommend that you carefully read the Results criterion in Appendix A of the AO prior to submitting a project proposal under this AO.

  • Question 19: Do we have to specify the timeline of our project or just the scope?

    Answer 19: Yes, you will need to provide a schedule of proposed activities. We recommend that you carefully read the Project Feasibility criterion in Appendix A of the AO and answer each of the questions in section 2.1 of the application form.

  • Question 20: What is the expected time after the submission deadline to hear about the results of the call for proposal and how long will it take to receive funding if approved?

    Answer 20: These details are provided in section 4.4 of the AO.

  • Question 21: Could you please clarify eligible projects? Under 3.2 "proposed projects must enable post-secondary students targeted by this AO". Does this mean that project participants must be post-secondary students or are project participants under the 4 listed EDI groups?

    Answer 21: While projects may reach a larger audience, in order to be eligible, projects must serve primarily post-secondary students from the 4 under-represented groups identified in section 3.2 of the AO.

  • Question 22: Do participants funded by this grant have to be students or they can be research assistants who are recent graduates and also hold a position in industry?

    Answer 22: To be eligible, participants must be post-secondary students from the 4 under-represented groups identified in section 3.2 of the AO.

  • Question 23: Do participants in activities have to be Canadian citizens?

    Answer 23: To be eligible, projects must serve post-secondary students from the 4 under-represented groups identified in section 3.2 of the AO registered in a Canadian post-secondary educational institution.

  • Question 24: It seems that EDI is evaluated as part of Criterion 1 (in Table 1/2). Is there a pass/fail portion related to whether EDI is sufficiently addressed in the proposal?

    Answer 24: No, there is no pass/fail portion, but we recommend that you carefully read all the criteria listed in Appendix A and answer all the questions on the application form based on the maximum score identified for each evaluation criterion.

Appendix A - Detailed Scoring

In this sectionappendix A

A numerical score is associated with each criterion. We strongly recommend that applicants include information that earns the highest of each score in their application.

1. Benefits to Canada: having greater equity, diversity and inclusion in the space sector

  • Maximum : 35
  • Minimum : 25

1.1 Merit of Project

This criterion is used to assess if the proposal demonstrates that the proposed approach meets the needs of the space sector, is innovative, and has a high potential to reach the clientele targeted by the AO.

  • Does the proposal clearly indicate the objectives and relevance of the proposed activities?
  • Does the proposal demonstrate originality in its approach and respond to needs identified by the space sector to ensure greater equity, diversity and inclusion in the space-related workforce?

Evaluation source: Section D of the application form

  • Poor: The applicant did not define a specific objective and the relevance of proposed activities is difficult to identify. The proposed activities have already been carried out and did not show conclusive results. (Score: 0)
  • Average: The applicant identified specific objectives and the relevance of proposed activities can be identified. The proposed activities have already been carried out and demonstrated mixed results. (Score: 8)
  • Good: The applicant identified specific objectives and the relevance of proposed activities is clearly identified. The proposed activities have already been carried out and demonstrated positive results or the proposed activities have not previously been carried out, but the proposed approach is innovative and has the potential for success. (Score: 18)
  • Excellent: The applicant identified specific objectives and the relevance and originality of proposed activities is clearly identified. The proposed activities have already been carried out and demonstrated positive results or the proposed activities have not previously been carried out, but the proposed approach is highly innovative and has high potential for success. (Score: 25)

1.2 Alignment with the CSA priorities and the Class G&C Program Objectives

This criterion evaluates how the project will contribute to the CSA priorities set out in Section 3.3 and the Class G&C Program Objectives set out in Section 3.4 of this AO.

  • Does the project description respond clearly to the priority described in Section 3.3 of the AO and the objectives indicated in Section 3.4 of the AO?

Evaluation source: Section D of the application form

  • Poor: The project has not demonstrated how it will meet the CSA priority and the Class G&C program Objectives. (Score: 0)
  • Average: The link between the project description and the CSA priority and the Class G&C program Objectives is weak. (Score: 3)
  • Good: The link between the project description and the CSA priority and the Class G&C program Objectives is clear (Score: 7)
  • Excellent: The link between the project description and the CSA priority and the Class G&C program Objectives is very clear. (Score: 10)

2. Project Feasibility

  • Maximum : 30
  • Minimum : 17

2.1 Plan Feasibility

This criterion evaluates to what degree the proposal demonstrates that the proposed work will be completed during the grant period. The schedule must summarize the milestones and deadlines.

  • Did the applicant clearly indicate their experience to serve the target clientele of this AO?
  • Does the plan include the key tasks and important milestones?
  • Is the duration as well as the identified resources realistic?

Evaluation Source: Section E of the application form

  • Poor: The applicant did not demonstrate their experience to serve the target clientele. The proposal does not include a plan. (Score: 0)
  • Average: The applicant has little to no experience serving the target clientele or offering them anything beyond its usual services. The proposal includes a plan, but it is not very detailed and doesn't include crucial tasks and milestones. The timelines and resources identified do not seem realistic. (Score: 10)
  • Good: The applicant is able to demonstrate experience in serving the target clientele. The proposal includes a detailed plan but does not appear to include certain tasks and milestones important to the project's success. The deadlines and resources identified seem realistic. (Score: 15)
  • Excellent: The applicant has strong experience in serving the target clientele. The proposal includes a detailed plan with all the tasks and milestones crucial to the project's success. Identified timelines and resources are detailed and realistic. (Score: 20)

2.2 Project-related risks and mitigation strategies

This criterion is used to evaluate the extent to which the proposal identifies the risks associated with the scope of the proposed activities, an assessment of the potential probability of the risks occurring, their level of impact on the activities, and mitigation strategies for each risk identified.

  • Have all potential risks been identified?
  • Does the assessment cover internal and external risks that could have an impact on the project?
  • Does the assessment consider the severity, probability of occurrence and potential impact on project implementation?
  • Will the proposed mitigation strategies reduce the potential risks identified?

Evaluation Source: Section E of the application form

  • Poor: The proposal includes few or no potential risks. No mitigation strategy was planned and included in the proposal. (Score: 0)
  • Average: The proposal includes some of the most common potential risks. A mitigation strategy is included but remains general and does not address all known potential risks. (Score: 3)
  • Good: The proposal includes the majority of the most common potential risks. A mitigation strategy is included but remains general and responds globally to all potential known risks. (Score: 7)
  • Excellent: The proposal includes all potentially foreseeable internal and external risks. A detailed mitigation strategy is included and responds to all potential identified risks. Score: 10)

3. Resources

  • Maximum : 25
  • Minimum : 17

3.1 Budget

This criterion evaluates if the expenses associated with project activities are eligible and reasonable for the successful completion of the project. This criterion will also consider prior experience of the organization and team members in managing budgets for projects of similar scope to the one proposed.

  • Does the applicant have previous experience with the financial management of projects of similar scope?
  • Are the submitted expenses eligible and indicated in the appropriate expense category?
  • Are the submitted expenses reasonable given the proposed activities?
  • Has the organization demonstrated the need to obtain CSA funding to carry out its project and demonstrated its expertise in managing multi-year budgets of similar size?
  • Will the applicant and or another partner be involved in the project through financial or in-kind contributions?

Evaluation Source: Section F of the application form

  • Poor: The applicant has not provided information on previous experience with the financial management of projects of a similar scale. The budget is incomplete and does not allow a decision on whether the expenses are eligible or reasonable. The organization did not demonstrate its capacity to manage budgets and carry out similar projects. (Score: 0)
  • Average: The applicant has provided information on previous experience with financial management, but the projects identified are not of a similar scale. The budget appears adequate for the proposed activities, but some expenses do not seem reasonable or justified. Some major expenses were not included in the submitted budget and could threaten the implementation of the project. The organization did not demonstrate its capacity to manage budgets and carry out similar projects. No financial or in-kind contribution by the applicant or other partners is included. (Score: 3)
  • Good: The applicant has provided information on previous experience with the financial management of projects of a similar scale. The expenses seem adequate and reasonable to successfully complete the proposed work. The organization demonstrated its capacity to manage budgets and carry out similar projects. The applicant or another partner will provide a financial or in-kind contribution. (Score: 7)
  • Excellent: The applicant has provided information on previous experience with the financial management of projects of a similar scale. The budget is detailed, and the expenses seem adequate and reasonable to successfully complete the proposed work. The organization demonstrated its capacity to manage budgets and carry out similar projects. The applicant and another partner will provide a financial or in-kind contribution. (Score: 10)

3.2 Expertise and Representation with Target Clientele

This criterion assesses the experience and representation of the organization and the team that will work with the target clientele. The proposal must include a description of prior experience with the target clientele and the role and responsibilities of team members who will be involved in the project, and whether team members identify as belonging to the designated target groups of this AO.

  • Have the organization and team members previously worked with the target clientele of this AO?
  • Does the proposal include the role and responsibilities of team members involved in the project?
  • Does the organization, or any of the team members, represent the demographic(s) that are the focus of the project?

Evaluation source: Section F of the application form

  • Poor: The organization does not have previous experience with the target clientele, nor does it or the project team represent the demographic(s) that are the focus of the project. The proposal does not include the role and responsibilities of all team members involved in the proposed project. (Score: 0)
  • Average: The organization has little previous experience with the target clientele, and/or the organization or team members are not representative of the demographic(s) that are the focus of the project. The proposal includes a poor description of the role and responsibilities of all team members involved in the proposed project or some team members do not have the complete suitable experience. (Score: 5)
  • Good: The organization has good previous experience with the target clientele, and/or there is good representation amongst the proposed team members of the demographic(s) that are the focus of the project. The proposal includes a good description of the role and responsibilities of all team members involved in the project, which is consistent with the proposed activities. (Score: 10)
  • Excellent: The organization has excellent previous experience with the target clientele, and/or the majority of the team members are representative of the demographic(s) that are the focus of the project. The proposal includes a very good description of the role and responsibilities of all team members involved in the project, which is consistent with the proposed activities. (Score: 15)

4. Results

  • Maximum : 10
  • Minimum : 7

4.1 Scope and sustainability

This criterion is used to assess the immediate and medium-term impact and the sustainability of the proposed project's activities, and how it contributes to the knowledge, integration and recognition of the clientele targeted by this AO in the space sector.

  • What is the expected number of participants?
  • How will we assess the impact of the activities on the target clientele?
  • Does the proposal include a sustainability plan, including the development of partnerships that will enable activities to continue after CSA funding ends?

Please note that for certain types of projects, the number of participants may not be evaluated, due to the very nature of the proposed activities.

Evaluation source: Section G of the application form

  • Poor: The proposal does not include a process for measuring results. The project submitted under category A will serve less than 3 participants and no example demonstrating the impact of the planned activities on increasing knowledge has been provided. Project submitted under category B will serve between 1 to 5 participants. No sustainability plan was included in the proposal. (Score: 0)
  • Average: The proposal includes a partial or incomplete process for measuring results. Project submitted under category A will serve a minimum of 4 participants, and a general example demonstrating the impact of the planned activities on increasing knowledge has been provided. Project submitted under category B will serve between 6 to 10 participants. For both project categories, a brief sustainability plan was included in the proposal. (Score: 5)
  • Good: The proposal includes a process that will measure most results. Project submitted under category A will serve a minimum of 5 participants and includes a concrete example of how the planned activities will increase knowledge. Project submitted under category B will serve between 11 to 20 participants. For both project categories, a brief sustainability plan has been included in the proposal, showing how the organization could continue to pursue the activities mentioned in its proposal with funds from other financial partners and/or collaborators after the end of the CSA funding period. (Score: 7)
  • Excellent: The proposal includes a process for measuring all results. Project submitted under category A will serve a minimum of 6 participants. The proposal includes at least two concrete examples demonstrating how the planned activities will increase knowledge. Project submitted under category B will serve more than 20 participants. For both project categories, a detailed sustainability plan has been included in the proposal, showing how the organization will continue to pursue the activities mentioned in its proposal with funds from other financial partners and/or collaborators after the end of the CSA funding period. (Score: 10)

References

& State of the Canadian Space Sector Report: Facts and Figures & . Canadian Space Agency.

Date modified: